Case proven! they cheated!

Knights submitted a complete list of drivel to the council in an effort to divert the Councils attention away from the new facts that have emerged since the appeal.

However in their hast to deny the facts, they inadvertently admitted in writing that their whole case for the capacity at the junction is based on “evidence” that they did not submit to the Inquiry, and ludicrously we actually have a copy of the discredited baseline evidence they cite in which they claim Meadow Lane is 28% narrower than it actually is.

In a month of Sundays, you really couldn’t make this lot up, could you?   But it seems that the developers creativity has no bounds and they actually did!

They have cheated and are putting lives at risk.  Our reply and it’s appendix is on the councils planning site, but feel free to download our letter here! KOMG AKNO Response 1.2

Woeful Designers Response; Our reply!

Yet again, Barratt Homes demonstrate that they do not give a fig about the safety of road users and pedestrians.   In our reply to the woeful Designers Response, we highlight Barratt Homes incredible destain for road safety….  again!

Here is our response to the Council.  This document and Appendices should be published on the Council’s Planning site.

KOMG Safety Response 1.0

We now understand that this application has now been pushed back to August 31st to go before the Planning Committee.

 

Planning Committee

We understand that this proposal will be put before the Planning Committee on AUGUST 19th, around 10am.

We’re hoping to speak on behalf of residents at the meeting and it will all be streamed live on the day.   We’ll let you know more as we find out.

UPDATE: We now understand that this application has now been pushed back to SEPTEMBER to go before the Planning Committee.